Age 2yrs, 9 mos, 21days
The record says that she was 2 years, 9 months, 21 days at death, presumably from the inscription on the stone (?). Assuming this is correct, doing the math gives 18 Oct 1900 for the death date. It wasn't Sep, as in the current record. I realize that the math is awkward, but it actually is straightforward, using the borrowing methods we use with decimal numbers. I've suggested this date.
Contributor: James Craft (48985354) • [email protected]
The record says that she was 2 years, 9 months, 21 days at death, presumably from the inscription on the stone (?). Assuming this is correct, doing the math gives 18 Oct 1900 for the death date. It wasn't Sep, as in the current record. I realize that the math is awkward, but it actually is straightforward, using the borrowing methods we use with decimal numbers. I've suggested this date.
Contributor: James Craft (48985354) • [email protected]
Age 2yrs, 9 mos, 21days
The record says that she was 2 years, 9 months, 21 days at death, presumably from the inscription on the stone (?). Assuming this is correct, doing the math gives 18 Oct 1900 for the death date. It wasn't Sep, as in the current record. I realize that the math is awkward, but it actually is straightforward, using the borrowing methods we use with decimal numbers. I've suggested this date.
Contributor: James Craft (48985354) • [email protected]
The record says that she was 2 years, 9 months, 21 days at death, presumably from the inscription on the stone (?). Assuming this is correct, doing the math gives 18 Oct 1900 for the death date. It wasn't Sep, as in the current record. I realize that the math is awkward, but it actually is straightforward, using the borrowing methods we use with decimal numbers. I've suggested this date.
Contributor: James Craft (48985354) • [email protected]
Family Members
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Advertisement
