Massive discrepancies exist in the official record. In the 1900 Census Ida claims to have migrated in 1884, but in the 1910 Census she is now claiming 1874 (this could be clerical error as the only difference is the 7;however, "seventy" and "eighty" don't sound anything alike). In the 1930 Census she is claiming to have emigrated in 1883. In 1900, she also claimed to have been born in January of 1863, but in the 1910 Census she is listed as 48, when she would have only been 47 (this could be simply error of memory, but it's important to note how the information changes from one census to the next).
Massive discrepancies exist in the official record. In the 1900 Census Ida claims to have migrated in 1884, but in the 1910 Census she is now claiming 1874 (this could be clerical error as the only difference is the 7;however, "seventy" and "eighty" don't sound anything alike). In the 1930 Census she is claiming to have emigrated in 1883. In 1900, she also claimed to have been born in January of 1863, but in the 1910 Census she is listed as 48, when she would have only been 47 (this could be simply error of memory, but it's important to note how the information changes from one census to the next).
Family Members
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
