1900 U. S. census: 49 Alexandria Avenue, Ward 2, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA.
1910 U. S. census: Ward 1, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA. Occupation: Manager, Wholesale Tobacco.
1920 U. S. census: Ward 7, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager, Tobacco Factory.
1930 U. S. census: Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Electric, Refrigerator.
1940 U. S. census: Ward 21, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager; Refrigerator.
MARRIAGE INFORMATION:
Married first to Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse on January 5, 1902 in Windsor, Sandwich Township, Essex County, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse filed an application for divorce from Frank McMillan Knott in Wayne County, Michigan on May 18, 1911 on the grounds of non-support and her divorce was granted September 27, 1911.
DEATH INFORMATION:
Cause of death: Cardionec Shock.
Burial site: Section G, Lot 432.
NEWS ARTICLES:
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Sunday, February 27, 1910, page 1, column 8 and page 2, column 1:
FRITCH WITNESS TRIES TO CAPTURE HER SMALL SON
MRS. BESSIE KNOTT STORMS HOUSE IN TAXICAB, BUT MISSES HIM.
DECLARES SHE'LL SUE HUSBAND FOR DIVORCE BECAUSE OF TROUBLE.
Trial of Case Has Been Costly to Both Sides in Money as Well as Time.
In a taxicab, accompanied by Attorney Rowland M. Connor and two deputies from Highland Park, Mrs. Bessie Knott, the pretty little witness in the Fritch trial whose testimony last Wednesday caused something of a sensation, made an unsuccessful attempt to regain possession of Kenneth, her 4-year old child, shortly after 3 o'clock Saturday afternoon.
It was the second time in four days that Mrs. Knott had resorted to the up-to-date method of "kidnaping" her child, who was taken from the Knott residence, at 123 Owen avenue, by Frank Knott, the father, assistant manager in the John T. Woodhouse cigar store on Woodward avenue, following his wife's testimony in behalf of Dr. George A. Fritch. All that the young mother recovered yesterday after an exciting ride in the taxi was part of her baby's clothing which she took to her home.
Since last Wednesday night when Knott and his wife separated, Mrs. Knott has been constantly searching for the pretty little youngster. Yesterday she was informed that the boy was being cared for at the home of E. C. Mitchell, 149 Calumet avenue.
Wouldn't Ask Police.
Mrs. Knott feared the story she told on the witness stand Wednesday, which was in direct contradiction to the testimony given by the witnesses for the state, might prevent her from securing aid from the local officers. So after a consultation with her attorney she enlisted the services of the Highland Park deputies and a hurried trip in the taxi to the Mitchell residence was planned.
When the "kidnaping" party reached the house on Calumet avenue it was unable to get any response from within. The members then walked around to the rear door which had been left unlocked. Mrs. Knott searched the house thoroughly but was unable to find her child or any other occupant. On the floor of an upstairs room she discovered the clothing which she insisted is her boy's.
It was while looking for Kenneth that E. C. Mitchell, it is said, suddenly appeared on the scene. He angrily demanded an explanation for the incursion and ordered Mrs. Knot, her attorney and the deputies to leave the house.
Fail to Find Child.
But Mrs. Knott was in no hurry to leave. She manifested the same reluctance to do so as characterized her refusal to be seared by Prosecuting Attorney Van Zale during her merciless cross-examination. And she did a little ordering herself, insisting that Mitchell produce her child or tell where he had been taken. Mitchell, Mrs. Knot says, professed his innocence in the matter and the woman, lawyer and officers, finally left without having secured any information as to the child's whereabouts.
Later Knott and his wife had a conference at the husband's place of business, it was agreed, Mrs. Knott said, that he would return the child to their home on Owen avenue, provided the wife would consent to remain out of the Fritch trial.
That the trial will be the means of permanently separating the pair now seems likely, Mrs. Knott said last night that she would begin suit for divorce from her husband Monday, charging cruelty, providing her husband did not return Kenneth before that time.
Will Seek Divorce.
It was suggested to Mrs. Knott that she and her husband would probably be able to adjust their differences after the Fritch trial was concluded.
"It will be no such thing, I'm determined to get this divorce and I intend standing by the story which I told on the stand," the young woman exclaimed earnestly.
Knott, it is understood, will not appear on the stand and swear that the testimony given by his wife was false, but will, instead, present the evidence of two persons who claim to have been at Dr. Fritsch' office on the afternoon of Aug. 27, and yet did not see Mrs. Knott there.
Mrs. Knott says she will be in the court room Monday and will again take the stand in behalf of the defendant if her services are needed.
E. C. Mitchell admitted last night that Mrs. Knott had made a trip to his home yesterday in an attempt to secure her child, by he refused to discuss the details of the visit.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, March 9, 1910, page 2, column 7:
Mrs. Knott and Husband Still Fight for Baby
The habeas corpus proceedings begun by Mrs. Bessie Knott, sensational witness for Dr. Fritch, against her husband, Frank M. Knott, who divided publicity honors with his wife as the man who slugged Attorney Frank Lodge, were again postponed in Judge Rohnert's court this morning.
Mrs. Knott is trying to get her child, whom she says is in the custody of her husband. Frank says he doesn't know where that child could possibly have gone.
Frank isn't so angry after all at his wife for trying to help Dr. Fritch remain in the open, for he smiled in a most sweet and abashed manner at her in the court room this morning. And she isn't so hostile towards Frank as some people would believe. For she returned Frank's friendly advance with a most bewitching smile.
But John T. Woodhouse, father of Bessie, declares that he is still as angry as ever, and avers that all the cigars in his store will long be turned to ashes and wafted to the four winds before he makes up with Frank, who formerly drew $200 per month from Mr. Woodhouse for acting as his manager.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 12, 1910, page 2, column 5:
MRS. KNOTT IN COURT.
Makes Another Effort to Find Her Child.
Mrs. Bessie Knott, witness in the Dr. Fritch case, made another futile visit to Judge Rohnert's court this morning to secure a writ of habeas corpus compelling her husband, Frank M. Knott, to produce their child.
Assistant Prosecutor Aldrich, representing Knott, declared that he is too ill to appear in court, and the case went over. Mrs. Knott accuses him of having hidden the child since they broke up housekeeping on the day that Knott made a scene in Judge Phelan's court by accusing his wife of perjury and slugging Attorney Frank C. Lodge. Knott says he can't imagine where the child can be, but he doesn't seem to be worrying much.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 19, 1910, page 2, column 6:
WILL NOT RELEASE KNOTT
Judge Rohnert Holds That He Can Produce Son in Court.
Judge Rohnert refused this morning to release from jail Frank M. Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, star witness in the Dr. Fritch trial.
"The father is legally entitled to the child until an affirmative showing is made that he is unworthy of its care," argued Attorney Schmalzriedt. "It has also to be shown that the restraint is in Wayne county, whereas Knott has declared that the child is in Canada."
"We have reason to believe that Knott has hidden the child in Detroit, and if the legal objections to Knott's arrest are to be heard on the merits, we will be able to successfully combat them," said Attorney Louis P. Wurzer, noting for Mrs. Knott.
"It is not necessary; Knott is plainly in contempt of court. His attorneys may take his case to the Supreme court if they wish," replied Judge Rohnert.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 2, column 2:
KNOTT RELEASED
WILLSHOW SON
Frank M. Knott, who has been in jail for six months because of his failure to produce at the circuit court's demand his son Kenneth, for whose custody his wife, Bessie Kott, was suing, secured his release from the county jail this morning.
On $500 bail Judge Donovan gave him liberty for 10 days, with the understanding that at the end of that time he would produce the boy. His attorney, John C. Spaulding, went on Knott's bond, and made himself personally responsible for the production of the child within 10 days.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 10:
SENDS KNOTT BACK TO JAIL
Released by One Judge and Committed by Another.
Frank Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, who was a witness in the trial of Dr. Fritch, and has been in jail for three months on a contempt of court charge for not producing his little boy in court on a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by his wife, was released by Judge Rohnert yesterday, after furnishing the information that the child was in charge of I. N. Stewart, Toronto, Canada. Louis C. Wurzer, attorney for Mrs. Knott, immediately secured an order from Judge Donovan that Knott produce the child. Knot said that he was not able to do so.
"Then go back to jail and stay till you are ready to do so," said Judge Donovan angrily. Knott was taken back to jail by Deputy Sheriff Sommerfield.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, July 2, 1910, page 10, columns 7 and 8:
FRANK KNOTT COMPLAINS
Frank Knott has appeared in Judge Donovan's court several times since the court made the order giving Kenneth Knott, the 6-year-old boy who was kept hidden in Canada for four months by Knott, to Mrs. Bessie Knott. Each time Frank complained that he was not being allowed to visit the child according to the directions given by the court.
Judge Donovan told him to appear in court with his attorneys and make formal complaint. Friday Knott appeared with his attorneys, Fred Schmalzriedt and J. C. Spaulding, but Mrs. Knott also had an attorney, Louis Wurzer, present. The latter stated that there would be no further trouble about seeing the child, and Frank testified that the barriers had been broken down the previous day.
The hearing on the merits to determine which shall have the child, father or mother, comes off July 8. Knott has been very busy the past few days gathering witnesses to prove that his wife is an undesirable person to have the child.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, July 13, 1910, page 20:
Knott Case Amicably Settled.
Believing that her delicate health would not permit her to maintain a household so that she could continue to care for her son Kenneth, Mrs. Bessie Knott, wife of Frank Knott, yesterday brought to a close the long legal controversy over the custody of the child. Mrs. Knott and her husband reached an agreement whereby each is given custody of the child for a specific length of time each year.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Frank M. Knott and his second wife Elizabeth T. (Dingwall) raised the son Frank and Elizabeth Irene "Bessie" (Woodhouse) Knott had in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA.
Frank M. Knott's family were Christian Scientists.
He testified at the murder trial of the abortionist, Dr. George A. Fritch, against Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse. According to the Detroit News' February 22, 1925 article, "Mrs. Bessie Knott...declared she was present in Dr. Fritch's office when the offense was supposed to have been committed. Her husband, Frank Knott, took the stand to brand her a perjurer. She was to get $200, he said, and she had offered him $150 to 'keep his mouth shut.'"
1910 U. S. census: Ward 1, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA. Occupation: Manager, Wholesale Tobacco.
1920 U. S. census: Ward 7, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager, Tobacco Factory.
1930 U. S. census: Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Electric, Refrigerator.
1940 U. S. census: Ward 21, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager; Refrigerator.
MARRIAGE INFORMATION:
Married first to Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse on January 5, 1902 in Windsor, Sandwich Township, Essex County, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse filed an application for divorce from Frank McMillan Knott in Wayne County, Michigan on May 18, 1911 on the grounds of non-support and her divorce was granted September 27, 1911.
DEATH INFORMATION:
Cause of death: Cardionec Shock.
Burial site: Section G, Lot 432.
NEWS ARTICLES:
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Sunday, February 27, 1910, page 1, column 8 and page 2, column 1:
FRITCH WITNESS TRIES TO CAPTURE HER SMALL SON
MRS. BESSIE KNOTT STORMS HOUSE IN TAXICAB, BUT MISSES HIM.
DECLARES SHE'LL SUE HUSBAND FOR DIVORCE BECAUSE OF TROUBLE.
Trial of Case Has Been Costly to Both Sides in Money as Well as Time.
In a taxicab, accompanied by Attorney Rowland M. Connor and two deputies from Highland Park, Mrs. Bessie Knott, the pretty little witness in the Fritch trial whose testimony last Wednesday caused something of a sensation, made an unsuccessful attempt to regain possession of Kenneth, her 4-year old child, shortly after 3 o'clock Saturday afternoon.
It was the second time in four days that Mrs. Knott had resorted to the up-to-date method of "kidnaping" her child, who was taken from the Knott residence, at 123 Owen avenue, by Frank Knott, the father, assistant manager in the John T. Woodhouse cigar store on Woodward avenue, following his wife's testimony in behalf of Dr. George A. Fritch. All that the young mother recovered yesterday after an exciting ride in the taxi was part of her baby's clothing which she took to her home.
Since last Wednesday night when Knott and his wife separated, Mrs. Knott has been constantly searching for the pretty little youngster. Yesterday she was informed that the boy was being cared for at the home of E. C. Mitchell, 149 Calumet avenue.
Wouldn't Ask Police.
Mrs. Knott feared the story she told on the witness stand Wednesday, which was in direct contradiction to the testimony given by the witnesses for the state, might prevent her from securing aid from the local officers. So after a consultation with her attorney she enlisted the services of the Highland Park deputies and a hurried trip in the taxi to the Mitchell residence was planned.
When the "kidnaping" party reached the house on Calumet avenue it was unable to get any response from within. The members then walked around to the rear door which had been left unlocked. Mrs. Knott searched the house thoroughly but was unable to find her child or any other occupant. On the floor of an upstairs room she discovered the clothing which she insisted is her boy's.
It was while looking for Kenneth that E. C. Mitchell, it is said, suddenly appeared on the scene. He angrily demanded an explanation for the incursion and ordered Mrs. Knot, her attorney and the deputies to leave the house.
Fail to Find Child.
But Mrs. Knott was in no hurry to leave. She manifested the same reluctance to do so as characterized her refusal to be seared by Prosecuting Attorney Van Zale during her merciless cross-examination. And she did a little ordering herself, insisting that Mitchell produce her child or tell where he had been taken. Mitchell, Mrs. Knot says, professed his innocence in the matter and the woman, lawyer and officers, finally left without having secured any information as to the child's whereabouts.
Later Knott and his wife had a conference at the husband's place of business, it was agreed, Mrs. Knott said, that he would return the child to their home on Owen avenue, provided the wife would consent to remain out of the Fritch trial.
That the trial will be the means of permanently separating the pair now seems likely, Mrs. Knott said last night that she would begin suit for divorce from her husband Monday, charging cruelty, providing her husband did not return Kenneth before that time.
Will Seek Divorce.
It was suggested to Mrs. Knott that she and her husband would probably be able to adjust their differences after the Fritch trial was concluded.
"It will be no such thing, I'm determined to get this divorce and I intend standing by the story which I told on the stand," the young woman exclaimed earnestly.
Knott, it is understood, will not appear on the stand and swear that the testimony given by his wife was false, but will, instead, present the evidence of two persons who claim to have been at Dr. Fritsch' office on the afternoon of Aug. 27, and yet did not see Mrs. Knott there.
Mrs. Knott says she will be in the court room Monday and will again take the stand in behalf of the defendant if her services are needed.
E. C. Mitchell admitted last night that Mrs. Knott had made a trip to his home yesterday in an attempt to secure her child, by he refused to discuss the details of the visit.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, March 9, 1910, page 2, column 7:
Mrs. Knott and Husband Still Fight for Baby
The habeas corpus proceedings begun by Mrs. Bessie Knott, sensational witness for Dr. Fritch, against her husband, Frank M. Knott, who divided publicity honors with his wife as the man who slugged Attorney Frank Lodge, were again postponed in Judge Rohnert's court this morning.
Mrs. Knott is trying to get her child, whom she says is in the custody of her husband. Frank says he doesn't know where that child could possibly have gone.
Frank isn't so angry after all at his wife for trying to help Dr. Fritch remain in the open, for he smiled in a most sweet and abashed manner at her in the court room this morning. And she isn't so hostile towards Frank as some people would believe. For she returned Frank's friendly advance with a most bewitching smile.
But John T. Woodhouse, father of Bessie, declares that he is still as angry as ever, and avers that all the cigars in his store will long be turned to ashes and wafted to the four winds before he makes up with Frank, who formerly drew $200 per month from Mr. Woodhouse for acting as his manager.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 12, 1910, page 2, column 5:
MRS. KNOTT IN COURT.
Makes Another Effort to Find Her Child.
Mrs. Bessie Knott, witness in the Dr. Fritch case, made another futile visit to Judge Rohnert's court this morning to secure a writ of habeas corpus compelling her husband, Frank M. Knott, to produce their child.
Assistant Prosecutor Aldrich, representing Knott, declared that he is too ill to appear in court, and the case went over. Mrs. Knott accuses him of having hidden the child since they broke up housekeeping on the day that Knott made a scene in Judge Phelan's court by accusing his wife of perjury and slugging Attorney Frank C. Lodge. Knott says he can't imagine where the child can be, but he doesn't seem to be worrying much.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 19, 1910, page 2, column 6:
WILL NOT RELEASE KNOTT
Judge Rohnert Holds That He Can Produce Son in Court.
Judge Rohnert refused this morning to release from jail Frank M. Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, star witness in the Dr. Fritch trial.
"The father is legally entitled to the child until an affirmative showing is made that he is unworthy of its care," argued Attorney Schmalzriedt. "It has also to be shown that the restraint is in Wayne county, whereas Knott has declared that the child is in Canada."
"We have reason to believe that Knott has hidden the child in Detroit, and if the legal objections to Knott's arrest are to be heard on the merits, we will be able to successfully combat them," said Attorney Louis P. Wurzer, noting for Mrs. Knott.
"It is not necessary; Knott is plainly in contempt of court. His attorneys may take his case to the Supreme court if they wish," replied Judge Rohnert.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 2, column 2:
KNOTT RELEASED
WILLSHOW SON
Frank M. Knott, who has been in jail for six months because of his failure to produce at the circuit court's demand his son Kenneth, for whose custody his wife, Bessie Kott, was suing, secured his release from the county jail this morning.
On $500 bail Judge Donovan gave him liberty for 10 days, with the understanding that at the end of that time he would produce the boy. His attorney, John C. Spaulding, went on Knott's bond, and made himself personally responsible for the production of the child within 10 days.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 10:
SENDS KNOTT BACK TO JAIL
Released by One Judge and Committed by Another.
Frank Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, who was a witness in the trial of Dr. Fritch, and has been in jail for three months on a contempt of court charge for not producing his little boy in court on a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by his wife, was released by Judge Rohnert yesterday, after furnishing the information that the child was in charge of I. N. Stewart, Toronto, Canada. Louis C. Wurzer, attorney for Mrs. Knott, immediately secured an order from Judge Donovan that Knott produce the child. Knot said that he was not able to do so.
"Then go back to jail and stay till you are ready to do so," said Judge Donovan angrily. Knott was taken back to jail by Deputy Sheriff Sommerfield.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, July 2, 1910, page 10, columns 7 and 8:
FRANK KNOTT COMPLAINS
Frank Knott has appeared in Judge Donovan's court several times since the court made the order giving Kenneth Knott, the 6-year-old boy who was kept hidden in Canada for four months by Knott, to Mrs. Bessie Knott. Each time Frank complained that he was not being allowed to visit the child according to the directions given by the court.
Judge Donovan told him to appear in court with his attorneys and make formal complaint. Friday Knott appeared with his attorneys, Fred Schmalzriedt and J. C. Spaulding, but Mrs. Knott also had an attorney, Louis Wurzer, present. The latter stated that there would be no further trouble about seeing the child, and Frank testified that the barriers had been broken down the previous day.
The hearing on the merits to determine which shall have the child, father or mother, comes off July 8. Knott has been very busy the past few days gathering witnesses to prove that his wife is an undesirable person to have the child.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, July 13, 1910, page 20:
Knott Case Amicably Settled.
Believing that her delicate health would not permit her to maintain a household so that she could continue to care for her son Kenneth, Mrs. Bessie Knott, wife of Frank Knott, yesterday brought to a close the long legal controversy over the custody of the child. Mrs. Knott and her husband reached an agreement whereby each is given custody of the child for a specific length of time each year.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Frank M. Knott and his second wife Elizabeth T. (Dingwall) raised the son Frank and Elizabeth Irene "Bessie" (Woodhouse) Knott had in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA.
Frank M. Knott's family were Christian Scientists.
He testified at the murder trial of the abortionist, Dr. George A. Fritch, against Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse. According to the Detroit News' February 22, 1925 article, "Mrs. Bessie Knott...declared she was present in Dr. Fritch's office when the offense was supposed to have been committed. Her husband, Frank Knott, took the stand to brand her a perjurer. She was to get $200, he said, and she had offered him $150 to 'keep his mouth shut.'"
1900 U. S. census: 49 Alexandria Avenue, Ward 2, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA.
1910 U. S. census: Ward 1, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA. Occupation: Manager, Wholesale Tobacco.
1920 U. S. census: Ward 7, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager, Tobacco Factory.
1930 U. S. census: Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Electric, Refrigerator.
1940 U. S. census: Ward 21, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager; Refrigerator.
MARRIAGE INFORMATION:
Married first to Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse on January 5, 1902 in Windsor, Sandwich Township, Essex County, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse filed an application for divorce from Frank McMillan Knott in Wayne County, Michigan on May 18, 1911 on the grounds of non-support and her divorce was granted September 27, 1911.
DEATH INFORMATION:
Cause of death: Cardionec Shock.
Burial site: Section G, Lot 432.
NEWS ARTICLES:
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Sunday, February 27, 1910, page 1, column 8 and page 2, column 1:
FRITCH WITNESS TRIES TO CAPTURE HER SMALL SON
MRS. BESSIE KNOTT STORMS HOUSE IN TAXICAB, BUT MISSES HIM.
DECLARES SHE'LL SUE HUSBAND FOR DIVORCE BECAUSE OF TROUBLE.
Trial of Case Has Been Costly to Both Sides in Money as Well as Time.
In a taxicab, accompanied by Attorney Rowland M. Connor and two deputies from Highland Park, Mrs. Bessie Knott, the pretty little witness in the Fritch trial whose testimony last Wednesday caused something of a sensation, made an unsuccessful attempt to regain possession of Kenneth, her 4-year old child, shortly after 3 o'clock Saturday afternoon.
It was the second time in four days that Mrs. Knott had resorted to the up-to-date method of "kidnaping" her child, who was taken from the Knott residence, at 123 Owen avenue, by Frank Knott, the father, assistant manager in the John T. Woodhouse cigar store on Woodward avenue, following his wife's testimony in behalf of Dr. George A. Fritch. All that the young mother recovered yesterday after an exciting ride in the taxi was part of her baby's clothing which she took to her home.
Since last Wednesday night when Knott and his wife separated, Mrs. Knott has been constantly searching for the pretty little youngster. Yesterday she was informed that the boy was being cared for at the home of E. C. Mitchell, 149 Calumet avenue.
Wouldn't Ask Police.
Mrs. Knott feared the story she told on the witness stand Wednesday, which was in direct contradiction to the testimony given by the witnesses for the state, might prevent her from securing aid from the local officers. So after a consultation with her attorney she enlisted the services of the Highland Park deputies and a hurried trip in the taxi to the Mitchell residence was planned.
When the "kidnaping" party reached the house on Calumet avenue it was unable to get any response from within. The members then walked around to the rear door which had been left unlocked. Mrs. Knott searched the house thoroughly but was unable to find her child or any other occupant. On the floor of an upstairs room she discovered the clothing which she insisted is her boy's.
It was while looking for Kenneth that E. C. Mitchell, it is said, suddenly appeared on the scene. He angrily demanded an explanation for the incursion and ordered Mrs. Knot, her attorney and the deputies to leave the house.
Fail to Find Child.
But Mrs. Knott was in no hurry to leave. She manifested the same reluctance to do so as characterized her refusal to be seared by Prosecuting Attorney Van Zale during her merciless cross-examination. And she did a little ordering herself, insisting that Mitchell produce her child or tell where he had been taken. Mitchell, Mrs. Knot says, professed his innocence in the matter and the woman, lawyer and officers, finally left without having secured any information as to the child's whereabouts.
Later Knott and his wife had a conference at the husband's place of business, it was agreed, Mrs. Knott said, that he would return the child to their home on Owen avenue, provided the wife would consent to remain out of the Fritch trial.
That the trial will be the means of permanently separating the pair now seems likely, Mrs. Knott said last night that she would begin suit for divorce from her husband Monday, charging cruelty, providing her husband did not return Kenneth before that time.
Will Seek Divorce.
It was suggested to Mrs. Knott that she and her husband would probably be able to adjust their differences after the Fritch trial was concluded.
"It will be no such thing, I'm determined to get this divorce and I intend standing by the story which I told on the stand," the young woman exclaimed earnestly.
Knott, it is understood, will not appear on the stand and swear that the testimony given by his wife was false, but will, instead, present the evidence of two persons who claim to have been at Dr. Fritsch' office on the afternoon of Aug. 27, and yet did not see Mrs. Knott there.
Mrs. Knott says she will be in the court room Monday and will again take the stand in behalf of the defendant if her services are needed.
E. C. Mitchell admitted last night that Mrs. Knott had made a trip to his home yesterday in an attempt to secure her child, by he refused to discuss the details of the visit.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, March 9, 1910, page 2, column 7:
Mrs. Knott and Husband Still Fight for Baby
The habeas corpus proceedings begun by Mrs. Bessie Knott, sensational witness for Dr. Fritch, against her husband, Frank M. Knott, who divided publicity honors with his wife as the man who slugged Attorney Frank Lodge, were again postponed in Judge Rohnert's court this morning.
Mrs. Knott is trying to get her child, whom she says is in the custody of her husband. Frank says he doesn't know where that child could possibly have gone.
Frank isn't so angry after all at his wife for trying to help Dr. Fritch remain in the open, for he smiled in a most sweet and abashed manner at her in the court room this morning. And she isn't so hostile towards Frank as some people would believe. For she returned Frank's friendly advance with a most bewitching smile.
But John T. Woodhouse, father of Bessie, declares that he is still as angry as ever, and avers that all the cigars in his store will long be turned to ashes and wafted to the four winds before he makes up with Frank, who formerly drew $200 per month from Mr. Woodhouse for acting as his manager.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 12, 1910, page 2, column 5:
MRS. KNOTT IN COURT.
Makes Another Effort to Find Her Child.
Mrs. Bessie Knott, witness in the Dr. Fritch case, made another futile visit to Judge Rohnert's court this morning to secure a writ of habeas corpus compelling her husband, Frank M. Knott, to produce their child.
Assistant Prosecutor Aldrich, representing Knott, declared that he is too ill to appear in court, and the case went over. Mrs. Knott accuses him of having hidden the child since they broke up housekeeping on the day that Knott made a scene in Judge Phelan's court by accusing his wife of perjury and slugging Attorney Frank C. Lodge. Knott says he can't imagine where the child can be, but he doesn't seem to be worrying much.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 19, 1910, page 2, column 6:
WILL NOT RELEASE KNOTT
Judge Rohnert Holds That He Can Produce Son in Court.
Judge Rohnert refused this morning to release from jail Frank M. Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, star witness in the Dr. Fritch trial.
"The father is legally entitled to the child until an affirmative showing is made that he is unworthy of its care," argued Attorney Schmalzriedt. "It has also to be shown that the restraint is in Wayne county, whereas Knott has declared that the child is in Canada."
"We have reason to believe that Knott has hidden the child in Detroit, and if the legal objections to Knott's arrest are to be heard on the merits, we will be able to successfully combat them," said Attorney Louis P. Wurzer, noting for Mrs. Knott.
"It is not necessary; Knott is plainly in contempt of court. His attorneys may take his case to the Supreme court if they wish," replied Judge Rohnert.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 2, column 2:
KNOTT RELEASED
WILLSHOW SON
Frank M. Knott, who has been in jail for six months because of his failure to produce at the circuit court's demand his son Kenneth, for whose custody his wife, Bessie Kott, was suing, secured his release from the county jail this morning.
On $500 bail Judge Donovan gave him liberty for 10 days, with the understanding that at the end of that time he would produce the boy. His attorney, John C. Spaulding, went on Knott's bond, and made himself personally responsible for the production of the child within 10 days.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 10:
SENDS KNOTT BACK TO JAIL
Released by One Judge and Committed by Another.
Frank Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, who was a witness in the trial of Dr. Fritch, and has been in jail for three months on a contempt of court charge for not producing his little boy in court on a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by his wife, was released by Judge Rohnert yesterday, after furnishing the information that the child was in charge of I. N. Stewart, Toronto, Canada. Louis C. Wurzer, attorney for Mrs. Knott, immediately secured an order from Judge Donovan that Knott produce the child. Knot said that he was not able to do so.
"Then go back to jail and stay till you are ready to do so," said Judge Donovan angrily. Knott was taken back to jail by Deputy Sheriff Sommerfield.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, July 2, 1910, page 10, columns 7 and 8:
FRANK KNOTT COMPLAINS
Frank Knott has appeared in Judge Donovan's court several times since the court made the order giving Kenneth Knott, the 6-year-old boy who was kept hidden in Canada for four months by Knott, to Mrs. Bessie Knott. Each time Frank complained that he was not being allowed to visit the child according to the directions given by the court.
Judge Donovan told him to appear in court with his attorneys and make formal complaint. Friday Knott appeared with his attorneys, Fred Schmalzriedt and J. C. Spaulding, but Mrs. Knott also had an attorney, Louis Wurzer, present. The latter stated that there would be no further trouble about seeing the child, and Frank testified that the barriers had been broken down the previous day.
The hearing on the merits to determine which shall have the child, father or mother, comes off July 8. Knott has been very busy the past few days gathering witnesses to prove that his wife is an undesirable person to have the child.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, July 13, 1910, page 20:
Knott Case Amicably Settled.
Believing that her delicate health would not permit her to maintain a household so that she could continue to care for her son Kenneth, Mrs. Bessie Knott, wife of Frank Knott, yesterday brought to a close the long legal controversy over the custody of the child. Mrs. Knott and her husband reached an agreement whereby each is given custody of the child for a specific length of time each year.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Frank M. Knott and his second wife Elizabeth T. (Dingwall) raised the son Frank and Elizabeth Irene "Bessie" (Woodhouse) Knott had in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA.
Frank M. Knott's family were Christian Scientists.
He testified at the murder trial of the abortionist, Dr. George A. Fritch, against Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse. According to the Detroit News' February 22, 1925 article, "Mrs. Bessie Knott...declared she was present in Dr. Fritch's office when the offense was supposed to have been committed. Her husband, Frank Knott, took the stand to brand her a perjurer. She was to get $200, he said, and she had offered him $150 to 'keep his mouth shut.'"
1910 U. S. census: Ward 1, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA. Occupation: Manager, Wholesale Tobacco.
1920 U. S. census: Ward 7, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager, Tobacco Factory.
1930 U. S. census: Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Electric, Refrigerator.
1940 U. S. census: Ward 21, Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA. Occupation: Manager; Refrigerator.
MARRIAGE INFORMATION:
Married first to Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse on January 5, 1902 in Windsor, Sandwich Township, Essex County, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse filed an application for divorce from Frank McMillan Knott in Wayne County, Michigan on May 18, 1911 on the grounds of non-support and her divorce was granted September 27, 1911.
DEATH INFORMATION:
Cause of death: Cardionec Shock.
Burial site: Section G, Lot 432.
NEWS ARTICLES:
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Sunday, February 27, 1910, page 1, column 8 and page 2, column 1:
FRITCH WITNESS TRIES TO CAPTURE HER SMALL SON
MRS. BESSIE KNOTT STORMS HOUSE IN TAXICAB, BUT MISSES HIM.
DECLARES SHE'LL SUE HUSBAND FOR DIVORCE BECAUSE OF TROUBLE.
Trial of Case Has Been Costly to Both Sides in Money as Well as Time.
In a taxicab, accompanied by Attorney Rowland M. Connor and two deputies from Highland Park, Mrs. Bessie Knott, the pretty little witness in the Fritch trial whose testimony last Wednesday caused something of a sensation, made an unsuccessful attempt to regain possession of Kenneth, her 4-year old child, shortly after 3 o'clock Saturday afternoon.
It was the second time in four days that Mrs. Knott had resorted to the up-to-date method of "kidnaping" her child, who was taken from the Knott residence, at 123 Owen avenue, by Frank Knott, the father, assistant manager in the John T. Woodhouse cigar store on Woodward avenue, following his wife's testimony in behalf of Dr. George A. Fritch. All that the young mother recovered yesterday after an exciting ride in the taxi was part of her baby's clothing which she took to her home.
Since last Wednesday night when Knott and his wife separated, Mrs. Knott has been constantly searching for the pretty little youngster. Yesterday she was informed that the boy was being cared for at the home of E. C. Mitchell, 149 Calumet avenue.
Wouldn't Ask Police.
Mrs. Knott feared the story she told on the witness stand Wednesday, which was in direct contradiction to the testimony given by the witnesses for the state, might prevent her from securing aid from the local officers. So after a consultation with her attorney she enlisted the services of the Highland Park deputies and a hurried trip in the taxi to the Mitchell residence was planned.
When the "kidnaping" party reached the house on Calumet avenue it was unable to get any response from within. The members then walked around to the rear door which had been left unlocked. Mrs. Knott searched the house thoroughly but was unable to find her child or any other occupant. On the floor of an upstairs room she discovered the clothing which she insisted is her boy's.
It was while looking for Kenneth that E. C. Mitchell, it is said, suddenly appeared on the scene. He angrily demanded an explanation for the incursion and ordered Mrs. Knot, her attorney and the deputies to leave the house.
Fail to Find Child.
But Mrs. Knott was in no hurry to leave. She manifested the same reluctance to do so as characterized her refusal to be seared by Prosecuting Attorney Van Zale during her merciless cross-examination. And she did a little ordering herself, insisting that Mitchell produce her child or tell where he had been taken. Mitchell, Mrs. Knot says, professed his innocence in the matter and the woman, lawyer and officers, finally left without having secured any information as to the child's whereabouts.
Later Knott and his wife had a conference at the husband's place of business, it was agreed, Mrs. Knott said, that he would return the child to their home on Owen avenue, provided the wife would consent to remain out of the Fritch trial.
That the trial will be the means of permanently separating the pair now seems likely, Mrs. Knott said last night that she would begin suit for divorce from her husband Monday, charging cruelty, providing her husband did not return Kenneth before that time.
Will Seek Divorce.
It was suggested to Mrs. Knott that she and her husband would probably be able to adjust their differences after the Fritch trial was concluded.
"It will be no such thing, I'm determined to get this divorce and I intend standing by the story which I told on the stand," the young woman exclaimed earnestly.
Knott, it is understood, will not appear on the stand and swear that the testimony given by his wife was false, but will, instead, present the evidence of two persons who claim to have been at Dr. Fritsch' office on the afternoon of Aug. 27, and yet did not see Mrs. Knott there.
Mrs. Knott says she will be in the court room Monday and will again take the stand in behalf of the defendant if her services are needed.
E. C. Mitchell admitted last night that Mrs. Knott had made a trip to his home yesterday in an attempt to secure her child, by he refused to discuss the details of the visit.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, March 9, 1910, page 2, column 7:
Mrs. Knott and Husband Still Fight for Baby
The habeas corpus proceedings begun by Mrs. Bessie Knott, sensational witness for Dr. Fritch, against her husband, Frank M. Knott, who divided publicity honors with his wife as the man who slugged Attorney Frank Lodge, were again postponed in Judge Rohnert's court this morning.
Mrs. Knott is trying to get her child, whom she says is in the custody of her husband. Frank says he doesn't know where that child could possibly have gone.
Frank isn't so angry after all at his wife for trying to help Dr. Fritch remain in the open, for he smiled in a most sweet and abashed manner at her in the court room this morning. And she isn't so hostile towards Frank as some people would believe. For she returned Frank's friendly advance with a most bewitching smile.
But John T. Woodhouse, father of Bessie, declares that he is still as angry as ever, and avers that all the cigars in his store will long be turned to ashes and wafted to the four winds before he makes up with Frank, who formerly drew $200 per month from Mr. Woodhouse for acting as his manager.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 12, 1910, page 2, column 5:
MRS. KNOTT IN COURT.
Makes Another Effort to Find Her Child.
Mrs. Bessie Knott, witness in the Dr. Fritch case, made another futile visit to Judge Rohnert's court this morning to secure a writ of habeas corpus compelling her husband, Frank M. Knott, to produce their child.
Assistant Prosecutor Aldrich, representing Knott, declared that he is too ill to appear in court, and the case went over. Mrs. Knott accuses him of having hidden the child since they broke up housekeeping on the day that Knott made a scene in Judge Phelan's court by accusing his wife of perjury and slugging Attorney Frank C. Lodge. Knott says he can't imagine where the child can be, but he doesn't seem to be worrying much.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, March 19, 1910, page 2, column 6:
WILL NOT RELEASE KNOTT
Judge Rohnert Holds That He Can Produce Son in Court.
Judge Rohnert refused this morning to release from jail Frank M. Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, star witness in the Dr. Fritch trial.
"The father is legally entitled to the child until an affirmative showing is made that he is unworthy of its care," argued Attorney Schmalzriedt. "It has also to be shown that the restraint is in Wayne county, whereas Knott has declared that the child is in Canada."
"We have reason to believe that Knott has hidden the child in Detroit, and if the legal objections to Knott's arrest are to be heard on the merits, we will be able to successfully combat them," said Attorney Louis P. Wurzer, noting for Mrs. Knott.
"It is not necessary; Knott is plainly in contempt of court. His attorneys may take his case to the Supreme court if they wish," replied Judge Rohnert.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 2, column 2:
KNOTT RELEASED
WILLSHOW SON
Frank M. Knott, who has been in jail for six months because of his failure to produce at the circuit court's demand his son Kenneth, for whose custody his wife, Bessie Kott, was suing, secured his release from the county jail this morning.
On $500 bail Judge Donovan gave him liberty for 10 days, with the understanding that at the end of that time he would produce the boy. His attorney, John C. Spaulding, went on Knott's bond, and made himself personally responsible for the production of the child within 10 days.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Friday, June 17, 1910, page 10:
SENDS KNOTT BACK TO JAIL
Released by One Judge and Committed by Another.
Frank Knott, husband of Bessie Knott, who was a witness in the trial of Dr. Fritch, and has been in jail for three months on a contempt of court charge for not producing his little boy in court on a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by his wife, was released by Judge Rohnert yesterday, after furnishing the information that the child was in charge of I. N. Stewart, Toronto, Canada. Louis C. Wurzer, attorney for Mrs. Knott, immediately secured an order from Judge Donovan that Knott produce the child. Knot said that he was not able to do so.
"Then go back to jail and stay till you are ready to do so," said Judge Donovan angrily. Knott was taken back to jail by Deputy Sheriff Sommerfield.
From the Detroit News (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Saturday, July 2, 1910, page 10, columns 7 and 8:
FRANK KNOTT COMPLAINS
Frank Knott has appeared in Judge Donovan's court several times since the court made the order giving Kenneth Knott, the 6-year-old boy who was kept hidden in Canada for four months by Knott, to Mrs. Bessie Knott. Each time Frank complained that he was not being allowed to visit the child according to the directions given by the court.
Judge Donovan told him to appear in court with his attorneys and make formal complaint. Friday Knott appeared with his attorneys, Fred Schmalzriedt and J. C. Spaulding, but Mrs. Knott also had an attorney, Louis Wurzer, present. The latter stated that there would be no further trouble about seeing the child, and Frank testified that the barriers had been broken down the previous day.
The hearing on the merits to determine which shall have the child, father or mother, comes off July 8. Knott has been very busy the past few days gathering witnesses to prove that his wife is an undesirable person to have the child.
From the Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, USA) on Wednesday, July 13, 1910, page 20:
Knott Case Amicably Settled.
Believing that her delicate health would not permit her to maintain a household so that she could continue to care for her son Kenneth, Mrs. Bessie Knott, wife of Frank Knott, yesterday brought to a close the long legal controversy over the custody of the child. Mrs. Knott and her husband reached an agreement whereby each is given custody of the child for a specific length of time each year.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Frank M. Knott and his second wife Elizabeth T. (Dingwall) raised the son Frank and Elizabeth Irene "Bessie" (Woodhouse) Knott had in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA.
Frank M. Knott's family were Christian Scientists.
He testified at the murder trial of the abortionist, Dr. George A. Fritch, against Elizabeth Irene Woodhouse. According to the Detroit News' February 22, 1925 article, "Mrs. Bessie Knott...declared she was present in Dr. Fritch's office when the offense was supposed to have been committed. Her husband, Frank Knott, took the stand to brand her a perjurer. She was to get $200, he said, and she had offered him $150 to 'keep his mouth shut.'"
Family Members
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Advertisement
