Newbury town records indicate he had no name but some internet sites have given him the name Samuel. However, the reference for this is unknown.
The book "Descendants of Thomas Hale" from 1889 give the son's birth and death as February but the Newbury records say December.
The book "Descendants of Thomas Hale" from 1889 give the son's birth and death as February but the Newbury records say December.
Newbury town records indicate he had no name but some internet sites have given him the name Samuel. However, the reference for this is unknown.
The book "Descendants of Thomas Hale" from 1889 give the son's birth and death as February but the Newbury records say December.
The book "Descendants of Thomas Hale" from 1889 give the son's birth and death as February but the Newbury records say December.
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
