|Karen Sipe (#46846911)|
| || member for 11 years, 14 days|
| [Add to MyFriends]|
|Bio and Links|
I am pleased to announce that Mt Pleasant has been completely photographed. That is those stones that are visible. The photos are not posted on FAG but I check the request list against my database.|
All those photo requests are most likely unmarked or illegible grave sites.
Any memorial page I have created I have a picture of the headstone.
If you want a photo officially request one, don't bury your request in a spouse or another family members photo request.
Too many volunteers are now asking for other volunteers to do their research, please try and do your own on your time.
I take responsibility ONLY for the information obtained from the headstone unless otherwise specified by me. There are very few exceptions.
Due to the changes and procedures for adding addition information it is very time consuming to include the source. Find A Grave DOES NOT provide a way to show where the information comes from.
In light of these changes and the automated edit system, which makes it almost impossible to deny acceptance of changes and addition, I have been transferring all memorial pages to those wishing to make edits. This too has become too time consuming.
Therefore, in order to include the changes whether the information is CORRECT OR NOT I feel I am being forced to accept all edits. I hate this part because I have had quite a few people send edits only to resend two or three times in order to make corrections.
If you find errors send corrections but do not, I repeat DO NOT ask me about the information posted or hold me responsible for the additions. This goes against all genealogical best practices, but the only other solution would be to take down all the memorials and pictures I have posted.
If you find an error,double listing or double picture please let me know so I can correct the problem.
I have in the past used a picture of the cemetery gate/sign with "Office couldn't locate a burial for this person" imprinted on it. If you get this posting and do find a picture of you persons tombstone, let me know and I will remove it.
SHOULD YOU WISH TO MANAGE A MEMORIAL PAGE, PLEASE JUST ASK FOR A TRANSFER.
| Contributions to|
Find A Grave
18,545 Memorials Added
17,353 Memorials Managed
10 Photo Requests
4,552 Volunteer Photos Taken
167 Virtual Flowers
1 Virtual Cemetery
4 Fame Ratings
|Find A Grave Friends|
Amber Brock, B. Caslon, Bonita Isabella, Carolyn Farnum, Diane Payne, G. Lester, Ginny Sharp, Gregory Park, Heather Morgan, Jim Sipe, Jo Bengtson Siv..., Jonathan Melusk..., Kasz Maciag, laura youtsey b..., Littlmouse, Mary D, Nils M. Solsvik..., Oz, Pennsylvania La..., Stephen Kronber..., [View all Find A Grave Friends...]
|Messages left for Karen Sipe (391)||[Leave Message]|
|MsFoxRider||RE: Mary Jane|
I didn't even think to look under Mary Jane. Thank you so much for your time, and all the memorials and photos!!
|MsFoxRider||Photo # 38393416|
First, I wanted to say thank you so much for your contributions to Find A Grave!!
Second, I know this is probably not possible, but can you please look at the photo for Benjamins and Eliza Monroe and tell me what the smaller stone to the left in the photograph says? I think it says Pollie something Oatley, which would make sense, as that's Eliza's daughter from her first marriage, but when I look in the index for this cemetery it's not coming up, nor is a Poll (y or ie) that works. Can you make out what that smaller stone says?
# 38393416 is the memorial photo I'm looking at. I've saved the photo and zoomed in and still not figuring out what it's indexed under.
Thank you for your time and any assistance you can provide!
|Cheryl||RE: Loena M. Vaughn|
I did contact her. I have not checked to see whether she did or not. I don't really care except that I do believe that whichever one has the most data, not the date when put up on the site, ought to be the criteria for who stays. Why not offer your better picture, or just put it there and remove your site? It is so confusing to have duplicate sites and whereas Ancestry is now saying that they have 162 M Memorial sites when my estimate is that a good ten percent are duplicates. It makes for sloppy research, IMHO; and is annoying.
Added by Cheryl on Jun 25, 2017 12:31 AM
You're welcome. Did you need anything from me?
Added by Shane on Jun 19, 2017 6:51 PM
No relation, just doing some research and ran across information from Cemetery burial cards.
Added by Shane on Jun 19, 2017 6:02 PM
This gravestone is a combination of a father, Gustave, and a daughter, Beverly.
Is it possible to have separate memorial numbers for each with Find A Grave? The relationship don't work correctly with other relatives the way it currently is.
Thank you for your efforts.
Added by wglogan on Jun 11, 2017 12:39 AM
|stillife||Albert G Smith|
Thank you for transferring the memorial to me and thank you for all your hard work in recording cemeteries - it is greatly appreciated!
Added by stillife on Jun 02, 2017 7:27 AM
|Alice||RE: Nathan Kaufman 69054841|
You are welcome. Is it the same headstone... but somehow in two different cems?
Added by Alice on Jun 01, 2017 5:46 PM
|P R Dutton||RE: George and Rachel Harrington|
It was my pleasure to do so. You're Very Welcome...
|Mark Fonda||RE: George Thompson Fonda 119653323|
Your absolutely correct and I've changed the burial location for George and his wife to unknown.
|[View all messages...]|