s/o A & M age 10 y 4 months d 26 Mar 1841
Information taken from 1976 cemetery index book. This grave is next to Margaret Rupert d 1862 w/o Adam Rupert
Robert & Catherine Chain in this row.
Likely s/o Adam Rupert and Margaret Goetz (or could be Margaret Chain
Dec 2011 stone photographed by Audrey Allison, however does not name this person as Robert - just "Rupert" died Nov 27, 1811. That means he was born about 1800.
Original information came from cemetery index book posted in 2001 listing complete name as Robert Rupert. Rehecked again Dec 2011 and older source names person as Robert Rupert. (Where did that older stone go?)
Not sure about death date on stone. Stone does not look to be from 1811, however more proof needed. Believe this is a replacement stone with information taken from an older corroded stone.
There are several other instances in this cemetery where dates on newer stones did not correlate with older information.
Parents may be this couple based on dates/transcription?
Parents:
Adam Rupert (1758 - 1840)
Margaret Goetz Rupert (1754 - 1841)
More to be studied on this.
Information taken from 1976 cemetery index book. This grave is next to Margaret Rupert d 1862 w/o Adam Rupert
Robert & Catherine Chain in this row.
Likely s/o Adam Rupert and Margaret Goetz (or could be Margaret Chain
Dec 2011 stone photographed by Audrey Allison, however does not name this person as Robert - just "Rupert" died Nov 27, 1811. That means he was born about 1800.
Original information came from cemetery index book posted in 2001 listing complete name as Robert Rupert. Rehecked again Dec 2011 and older source names person as Robert Rupert. (Where did that older stone go?)
Not sure about death date on stone. Stone does not look to be from 1811, however more proof needed. Believe this is a replacement stone with information taken from an older corroded stone.
There are several other instances in this cemetery where dates on newer stones did not correlate with older information.
Parents may be this couple based on dates/transcription?
Parents:
Adam Rupert (1758 - 1840)
Margaret Goetz Rupert (1754 - 1841)
More to be studied on this.
s/o A & M age 10 y 4 months d 26 Mar 1841
Information taken from 1976 cemetery index book. This grave is next to Margaret Rupert d 1862 w/o Adam Rupert
Robert & Catherine Chain in this row.
Likely s/o Adam Rupert and Margaret Goetz (or could be Margaret Chain
Dec 2011 stone photographed by Audrey Allison, however does not name this person as Robert - just "Rupert" died Nov 27, 1811. That means he was born about 1800.
Original information came from cemetery index book posted in 2001 listing complete name as Robert Rupert. Rehecked again Dec 2011 and older source names person as Robert Rupert. (Where did that older stone go?)
Not sure about death date on stone. Stone does not look to be from 1811, however more proof needed. Believe this is a replacement stone with information taken from an older corroded stone.
There are several other instances in this cemetery where dates on newer stones did not correlate with older information.
Parents may be this couple based on dates/transcription?
Parents:
Adam Rupert (1758 - 1840)
Margaret Goetz Rupert (1754 - 1841)
More to be studied on this.
Information taken from 1976 cemetery index book. This grave is next to Margaret Rupert d 1862 w/o Adam Rupert
Robert & Catherine Chain in this row.
Likely s/o Adam Rupert and Margaret Goetz (or could be Margaret Chain
Dec 2011 stone photographed by Audrey Allison, however does not name this person as Robert - just "Rupert" died Nov 27, 1811. That means he was born about 1800.
Original information came from cemetery index book posted in 2001 listing complete name as Robert Rupert. Rehecked again Dec 2011 and older source names person as Robert Rupert. (Where did that older stone go?)
Not sure about death date on stone. Stone does not look to be from 1811, however more proof needed. Believe this is a replacement stone with information taken from an older corroded stone.
There are several other instances in this cemetery where dates on newer stones did not correlate with older information.
Parents may be this couple based on dates/transcription?
Parents:
Adam Rupert (1758 - 1840)
Margaret Goetz Rupert (1754 - 1841)
More to be studied on this.
Family Members
Advertisement
Advertisement
