Sarah Vickery contributed this information :Rose seems to have fudged a bit on her age. There is a birth record for her, in Vermont, as born 12/19/1877. The 1880 census gives her age as 2, with original surname Shortsleve or Shortsleeves.
The 1900 census says she was born 12/1878. The 1910 has abt. 1879. She gave her age, on the marriage record, as 32, which would put her birth at about 1888. The 1928 death year is correct!
The 1900 census says she was born 12/1878. The 1910 has abt. 1879. She gave her age, on the marriage record, as 32, which would put her birth at about 1888. The 1928 death year is correct!
Sarah Vickery contributed this information :Rose seems to have fudged a bit on her age. There is a birth record for her, in Vermont, as born 12/19/1877. The 1880 census gives her age as 2, with original surname Shortsleve or Shortsleeves.
The 1900 census says she was born 12/1878. The 1910 has abt. 1879. She gave her age, on the marriage record, as 32, which would put her birth at about 1888. The 1928 death year is correct!
The 1900 census says she was born 12/1878. The 1910 has abt. 1879. She gave her age, on the marriage record, as 32, which would put her birth at about 1888. The 1928 death year is correct!
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
