Actions
Begin New Search
Refine Last Search
Cemetery Lookup
Add Burial Records
Help with Find A Grave

Top Contributors
Success Stories
Community Forums
Find A Grave Store

Log In
Advertisement
Charlie Morgan (#47142894)
 member for 7 years, 2 months, 8 days
[Add to MyFriends]
Bio and Links
Bio Photo I do not adhere strictly to the FAQ suggestion (not a directive) that transfer requests should be for direct relatives within four generations (i.e., siblings, parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren). I will transfer management of any memorial to any member of the extended family of the person in a memorial upon request with pleasure, provided that such person is equally liberal in granting transfer requests.

Personally, I'd rather have a memorial managed by a member of the extended family who has significant motivation to maximize the content of the memorial due to the family relationship than continue managing it myself. The distance back in time or the degree of relationship to that ancestor is irrelevant to the question of a person's commitment to the memorial.

Please provide your relationship to the person in the memorial when making the request.

*********************************************

This has been said about genealogy and I rather think that it applies with equal force to the volunteer work done here at Find A Grave:

Genealogy begins as an interest,
Becomes a hobby,
Continues as an avocation,
Takes over as an obsession,
And in its last stage,
Is an incurable disease.

*********************************************

If you would like me to take cemetery pictures for you, please include the grave location - one way to learn a grave location is to phone the cemetery; if a cemetery with thousands or even tens of thousands of graves has 20 photo requests and I have only an hour or two to take photographs, I am likely to select first the requests that include the grave location. Also, if you want multiple photographs (e.g., husband and wife), list both/all of them; I feel that I more helpful the more pictures that I take, so I am likely to give priority to a pair of requests.

*********************************************

If you would like to use one of my photos for your own personal purposes (e.g., to post on a profile on your family tree at Ancestry.com), feel free to do so, but please provide attribution (along the lines of "Originally contributed to the memorial for [name of person] on Find A Grave by Charlie Morgan").

*********************************************

A note about the Transcriptions Field - it's very time consuming to complete. I concur completely with the following comment made by Stauffacher56 in a thread in one of the Forums here: "I think the transcription is about the marker and should include everything it says. If I omit something (usually due to readability issues, sometimes because living persons are mentioned) I'll mention the nature of the omission in the note field. Things like names and dates could be presented differently on the marker vs. the fields on the top of the page. Photos aren't viewable by everyone, sometimes they're not very clear, and sometimes there isn't a photo at all. The transcription fills those gaps."

By making a complete transcription of the inscription, we do a big favor to folks without eyesight who depend on electronic readers to speak the words of a website to them. Those readers cannot read photographs.

Regarding living people, I find it impossible to "know" who is living or not. The fact that there might be a name on a grave marker either without any dates or with a birth date but no death date could mean that the person is deceased but the marker has not been updated (or it could reflect the fact that the person is not deceased). We cannot know the status of such a person without access to the immediate family. Of course, a faithful transcription needs to include that information since it is right there on the marker under the photos tab.

The tougher question is whether it is appropriate to create a memorial for a person whose death information is absent from the grave marker. Find A Grave rules prohibit the creation of a memorial if, but only if, the person is living. In the absence of knowing, however, I find it reasonable to create the memorial since the grave marker does mark the grave of the person. That is particularly true since I have found many instances where the death information is absent from the marker but I know that the person is deceased. Of course, I will delete a memorial promptly when contacted by a member of the family advising that the person is living and requesting deletion.
 Contact:
or
Leave Public Message
Contributions to
Find A Grave
 • 12,293 Memorials Added
 • 12,356 Memorials Managed
 • 33 Memorials/Week
 • 6,105 Photos
 • 16 Photo Requests
 • 23 Volunteer Photos Taken
 • 20 Virtual Flowers
 • 2 Virtual Cemeteries
 • 7 Fame Ratings
 • 8 Sponsorships
 • 7 Friends
Search Contributor's Records

 
First NameLast Name

Virtual Cemeteries
Morgan (280)
Waskas (1)
Find A Grave Friends
Bette Hartman, David Morgan, Dessau7, family historia..., PupDawg, Sharon Schweize..., Stuart Strout W...
Messages left for Charlie Morgan (205)[Leave Message]
Nathan Haines
Fred Audleigh Fuller
You sent an edit wanting it changed from died 1970 to died May 1, 1970.
I had to look at that and make sure that was right and wonder why I only put 1970 and not the rest of it.
Fred did not die May 1, he died May 10.
There are two different entries in Ancestry.com's OR death index for Fred.
One says he was born about 1879 and died May 10, 1970.
The other entry does not say a year born, just died May 1, 1970.
Then, besides that, I have an Oregon death index on cd that I got some years ago. It only has one entry for Fred, that he died May 10th.
In "all the years" I have never in my life seen a state death index with so gosh dang many errors in it. It is almost "laughable" sometimes in places. Don't know why that happened? If careless people made the transcription of the state death index, or if the state index had so dang many errors in it for anyone to transcribe from or if it was hard to read the state index or what, I am not sure??
Anyway, Fred's funeral notice was in the newspaper May 12 and they just don't wait two weeks before they put a funeral notice into the newspaper.
Nathan
Added by Nathan Haines on Jun 21, 2016 3:46 PM
Roseanne Barbeau
Farner Family in New Jersey
Hello Charlie,

I appreciate the changes and additions you made for this family. And I truly appreciate your prompt responses to my request!

Thank you for all your help.

Roseanne




Added by Roseanne Barbeau on Jun 17, 2016 8:08 AM
Darlyn Bellon
request for transfer
Hi Charlie
Would you consider transferring my immediate
family to me.
My parents- Lockie & Stella BeLong
My sister-Annie Marie( BeLong) Williams
My Great Grandparents- Joseph & Sarah BeLong
My Great Uncles-Henry Edson/Jeremiah Daley &
John Enslow BeLong because they are listed on the same stone.
The graves are found in Lockeport & West Green Harbour, Shelburne county,Nova Scotia

I will add the photos of the stones to the sites as I have done on www.CanadianHeadstones.com

Thank you
Darlyn B.




Added by Darlyn Bellon on Jun 06, 2016 7:54 PM
lifescribe
Bio sources
Thanks much,... for the info, links. Great contribution.
Added by lifescribe on May 27, 2016 10:01 AM
lifescribe
Bio sources
Just wondering your sources for the bio on Rev. Ira. Thanks.
Added by lifescribe on May 27, 2016 6:49 AM
KKCoderre
Memorial# 138345160
Thank you Charlie for the transfer. It is greatly appreciated.
Added by KKCoderre on May 18, 2016 2:11 PM
Betty Paulsen
RE: Samuel Stewart
I have put you on my email address.
I will send you an email to make sure it comes through to you.
Betty
Added by Betty Paulsen on May 12, 2016 12:32 PM
Betty Paulsen
RE: Samuel Stewart
Family History Library in Salt Lake City, Utah
Added by Betty Paulsen on May 12, 2016 12:19 PM
Betty Paulsen
RE: Samuel Stewart
I will see what I can find out in my containers. I have also. I do have a copy of that General Stewart's A Family Record, that he had his family publish. That is one thing I have been adding to my personal file.
Plus I have from the Stewart Clan Magazine, PG:291-292 Stewarts In Tolland County, Conn.
I have also learned from others that those that wrote some of these histories from ancestors back there, have made mistakes as we do today.
So I agree in many things that are put out there and must find the right sources for it all. I can't stand to not have things wrong and will try and make it right.
Thank you again.
Added by Betty Paulsen on May 12, 2016 12:10 PM
Betty Paulsen
RE: Samuel Stewart
Thank you for getting back with me. I will give you what I have but my proof is in containers because I have moved around a lot and my parents are passed away and I have a lot to sort through from their books and mine.

This is what I have
Patience Miriam Hungerford
B. 13 February 1753 New Fairfield, Fairfield, Conntecticut
CHR: 25 March 1753 same place
Died: 807-9 Gurley Cemetery recorded her name is Menam, died age 39 yrs. PG:96; FHL Film #: 0003343
Parents: Samuel Hungerford and Mary Graves
This is what I also found on Samuel Hungerford

(Stuart Clan Magazine; FHL Film #: 1,018,913
Born in Millington Ecclesiastical Society, East Haddam, Conn. Marriage recorded in 2nd Congregational Church, Rev. Ephraim Little, Pastor. Samuel moved to New Fairfield, Comm., before June 21, 1749. He was appointed representative for Deputy of the Freemen of New Fairfield in 1777 and again in 1778 (see records of the State of Connecticut, 408, 411 and 436).
Mrs. W. Himebaugh's Hungerford Genealogy, I find the following:
On Aug. 16, 1763, Gov. Wentworth granted a patent of a township named Hugerford...
From State papers of New Hampshire, VOl. 26, pp. 713-714 &c, regarding land grants of Samuel Hungerford. He was one of 70 grantees of 23,040 acres in Merrill, H..H., in Peacock, Fairfield, Smithfield, Linington, Hungerford, &c, &c. In Nov., 1766, he with many others petitioned the King for relief, it having been found that at least part of the lands did not belong to Vt., but to N.Y.
"Many of the grantees having put in all of their savings were about to be reduced to absolute poverty.
Samuel Hungerford and several others were chosen by the petitioners to look after their rights and to obtain a full confirmation to them of the lands on such terms as they could.
The grants provided that every grantee should plant and cultivate five acres for every fifty contained in the petition on penalty of forfeiture. That all white and other pine trees suitable for masting the Royal Navy, should be carefully preserved and not felled without special license.
That before any division of land be made that a tract in as near the center as possible be laid out and reserved for town lots of one acre to each grantee. In payment the grantee was to pay therefore, for the space of ten years from the date of the grant, the rent of one ear of Indian corn, only on Dec. 25, annually, it lawfully demanded and after the expiration of ten years, one shilling proclamation money for every hundred acres, the owners to be in lien of all other rents.
In Mr. J. Phelps Leach's Hungerford Genealogy, I find:
And 1763, he obtained of Gov. Benning Wentworth, grantes of three townships on the N.E. of Lake Champlain, chartered by the names of Fairfield, Smithfield, and Hungerford (Sheldon).
In 1783 he sent his son Isaiah to manage the prudent affairs of the townships, and Isaiah and Hubbard Barlow were chosen to lay out the divisions of land to each proprietor (see first book of records of Fairfield, Vt.)
Died at age 64 years 3 months.)

I thank you for your help. I do have Samuel with a second wife named Mary. but that is all I have on her.
Again, thank you for your help. I can use all the help I can and will be glad to give you anything I have.
Betty Paulsen
Added by Betty Paulsen on May 12, 2016 11:40 AM
[View all messages...]
 

Privacy Statement and Terms of Service