d/o William J. & Martha E. Case
The dates were submitted in sag, the stone is hard to read & the dates given could be incorrect. Their son Carl D. Case was born 30,June,1886 & really don't think that this child would have been born 6 mos. later. I did find a birth record for a male child born to them 9,Sept,1888. Martha, according to the 1900 census had 8 children, 3 living which were with her on the census, they were Carl D.,Georgia & Luellen (Twin of Lucile).
The dates were submitted in sag, the stone is hard to read & the dates given could be incorrect. Their son Carl D. Case was born 30,June,1886 & really don't think that this child would have been born 6 mos. later. I did find a birth record for a male child born to them 9,Sept,1888. Martha, according to the 1900 census had 8 children, 3 living which were with her on the census, they were Carl D.,Georgia & Luellen (Twin of Lucile).
d/o William J. & Martha E. Case
The dates were submitted in sag, the stone is hard to read & the dates given could be incorrect. Their son Carl D. Case was born 30,June,1886 & really don't think that this child would have been born 6 mos. later. I did find a birth record for a male child born to them 9,Sept,1888. Martha, according to the 1900 census had 8 children, 3 living which were with her on the census, they were Carl D.,Georgia & Luellen (Twin of Lucile).
The dates were submitted in sag, the stone is hard to read & the dates given could be incorrect. Their son Carl D. Case was born 30,June,1886 & really don't think that this child would have been born 6 mos. later. I did find a birth record for a male child born to them 9,Sept,1888. Martha, according to the 1900 census had 8 children, 3 living which were with her on the census, they were Carl D.,Georgia & Luellen (Twin of Lucile).
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
