Bardenheier had been robbed of his silver watch, and $3.00 of silver. Police weren't sure of the true motive of the crime. One theory, was that the murder was part of a plan to rob Bardenheier's Shop of merchandise which was valued at over $7,000.00. Another theory (given more credence), was that the murder was a "revenge killing", for Bardenheier testifying against two men (which led to their conviction), when he lived in Chicago.
One other strange twist in the case, was when a young boy had arrived in Bardenheier's store, on the morning he disappeared. Mrs. Bardenheier had recognized the boy as a former neighbor of theirs, from Chicago. The boy told Mrs. Bardenheier, that Mr. Bardenheier had been robbed. She fed the boy, and sent him away with $2.50 (this is why the Chicago connection to the murder is given more thought, than the robbery theory).
The killer(s) were never caught.
Bardenheier had been robbed of his silver watch, and $3.00 of silver. Police weren't sure of the true motive of the crime. One theory, was that the murder was part of a plan to rob Bardenheier's Shop of merchandise which was valued at over $7,000.00. Another theory (given more credence), was that the murder was a "revenge killing", for Bardenheier testifying against two men (which led to their conviction), when he lived in Chicago.
One other strange twist in the case, was when a young boy had arrived in Bardenheier's store, on the morning he disappeared. Mrs. Bardenheier had recognized the boy as a former neighbor of theirs, from Chicago. The boy told Mrs. Bardenheier, that Mr. Bardenheier had been robbed. She fed the boy, and sent him away with $2.50 (this is why the Chicago connection to the murder is given more thought, than the robbery theory).
The killer(s) were never caught.
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement